Keterbukaan Dosen terhadap Kritik Mahasiswa sebagai Upaya Penguatan Relasi Akademik di Lingkungan Fakultas Hukum
Keywords:
Keterbukaan dosen, psychological safety, partisipasi mahasiswa, kualitas pembelajaran, fenomenologi, pendidikan hukum.Abstract
Keterbukaan dosen terhadap kritik mahasiswa dalam konteks pendidikan hukum merupakan elemen penting untuk membangun iklim pembelajaran yang partisipatif dan dialogis. Namun, studi empiris yang menelaah bagaimana keterbukaan ini diwujudkan, dipersepsikan mahasiswa, dan berimplikasi terhadap kualitas interaksi dan pembelajaran masih terbatas. Penelitian ini bertujuan untuk mengeksplorasi praktik keterbukaan dosen di Fakultas Hukum Institut Agama Islam Rawa Aopa Konawe Selatan, menilai efektivitasnya dari perspektif mahasiswa, serta menganalisis implikasinya terhadap dinamika kelas dan kualitas pembelajaran hukum. Pendekatan yang digunakan adalah kualitatif fenomenologis, dengan dosen sebagai informan kunci dan mahasiswa sebagai informan pendukung, dipilih melalui purposive sampling. Data dikumpulkan melalui wawancara semi-terstruktur, observasi partisipatif, dan dokumentasi akademik, kemudian dianalisis menggunakan Model Miles & Huberman (1994) melalui reduksi, penyajian, dan penarikan kesimpulan, serta diverifikasi melalui triangulasi dan member checking. Hasil menunjukkan bahwa keterbukaan dosen terejawantah melalui komunikasi formal, interaksi informal, dan mekanisme umpan balik anonim, yang menciptakan psychological safety bagi mahasiswa. Tindak lanjut nyata terhadap kritik, seperti penyesuaian tempo penjelasan, elaborasi materi, dan adaptasi pedagogis, meningkatkan partisipasi mahasiswa, interaksi akademik yang egaliter, dan relevansi pembelajaran bagi generasi digital.Temuan ini menegaskan bahwa keterbukaan dosen tidak hanya memfasilitasi dialog, tetapi juga memperkuat kualitas pembelajaran hukum. Secara teoretis, penelitian ini memperluas pemahaman keterbukaan sebagai konstruksi sosial dan pedagogis, dan secara praktis memberikan dasar bagi strategi pengajaran responsif di pendidikan tinggi
Downloads
References
Blumer, H. (1969). Symbolic interactionism: Perspective and method. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice-Hall.
Boud, D., & Molloy, E. (2019). Feedback as dialogue: Fostering student learning through high-quality interactions. Assessment & Evaluation in Higher Education, 43(3), 422–438. doi::10.1080/02602938.2018.1463354
Bryk, A. S., & Schneider, B. (2002). Trust in schools: A core resource for improvement. New York, NY: Russell Sage Foundation.
Chen, L., & Wang, J. (2021). Teacher openness and dialogic learning in higher education: Bridging feedback and student participation. Journal of Educational Communication, 32(2), 123–142.
Clausen, N. R., Shrestha, P., & Pedersen, S. H. (2025). First-year university students’ perspectives on their psychological safety, team creativity, and academic well-being in problem-based learning teams . Education Sciences, 15(2), 236. doi:https://doi.org/10.3390/educsci15020236
Creswell, J. W., & Poth, C. N. (2018). Qualitative inquiry and research design: Choosing among five approaches (4th ed.). Thousand Oaks, CA: SAGE Publications.
DeVito, J. A. (2019). The interpersonal communication book (15th ed.). Boston, MA: Pearson.
Di Lisio, G., Halty, A., Berástegui, A., Milá Roa, A., & Couso Losada, A. (2025). The longitudinal associations between teacher–student relationship quality and academic (dis)engagement. Social Psychology of Education. doi:10.1007/s11218-025-10107-8.
Edmondson, A. C. (2019). The fearless organization: Creating psychological safety in the workplace for learning, innovation, and growth. Hoboken, NJ: John Wiley & Sons.
Edmondson, A. C., & Lei, Z. (2014). Psychological safety: The history, renaissance, and future of an interpersonal construct. Annual Review of Organizational Psychology and Organizational Behavior, 1, 23–43.
Foucault, M. (1980). Power/knowledge: Selected interviews and other writings, 1972–1977 (C. Gordon, Ed.). New York, NY: Pantheon Books.
Freeman, S., Eddy, S. L., McDonough, M., Smith, M. K., Okoroafor, N., Jordt, H., & Wenderoth, M. P. (2017). Active learning increases student performance in science, engineering, and mathematics. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 111(23), 8410–8415. doi:https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.1319030111
Freire, P. (1970). Pedagogy of the oppressed. New York, NY: Continuum.
García Morales, V. J., López Martín, F., & Llorens Montes, F. J. (2022). Building relational trust in university classrooms: The role of teacher openness and psychological safety. Studies in Higher Education, 47(8), 1692–1710.
Hardie, P., Tussie, K., Edwards, D., & Tait, G. (2022). Key tips to providing a psychologically safe learning environment for students. National Center for Biotechnology Information (NCBI) / MedEdPublish. doi:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC97069
Hardy, I., Simpson, A., & Hand, B. (2022). Measuring adaptive teaching in classroom discourse. Frontiers in Education, 1041316, 7. doi:https://doi.org/10.3389/feduc.2022.1041316
Huberman, A. M., & Miles, M. B. (1994). Qualitative data analysis: An expanded sourcebook (2nd ed.). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage Publications.
Johnson, M., & Narayanan, R. (2022). Adaptive pedagogy and teacher responsiveness in culturally diverse university settings. Higher Education Research & Development, 41(4), 745–762.
Ju, Y., & Huang, J.-H. (2024). College students’ perception of teachers’ humble leadership and its impact on creativity: The mediating role of trust in teachers. Eurasian Journal of Educational Research, 111, 18–33. doi:https://doi.org/10.42010/Ejer.2024.111
Kim, J., & Lee, S. (2023). The role of informal faculty–student interaction in enhancing student engagement and academic courage in Asian higher education. Higher Education Research & Development, 42(3), 604–620.
Li, J., Wang, Y., Chen, H., & Xu, L. (2023). Student engagement and its influencing factors: A systematic review and meta-analysis. Frontiers in Psychology, 1132451, https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2023.1132451.
McGuire, M. (2025). Feedback, reflection and psychological safety. Assessment & Evaluation in Higher Education. doi:https://doi.org/10.1080/02602938.2025.2548590
Mead, G. H. (1934). Mind, self, and society. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.
Meredith, J. (2020). Experiences of psychological safety in the classroom (Master’s thesis). Taylor University.
Molloy, E., Boud, D., & Henderson, M. (2020). Developing a sustainable feedback ecosystem. Assessment & Evaluation in Higher Education, 45(3), 325–340. doi:10.1080/02602938.2019.1667955.
O’Connor, C., & Michaels, S. (2020). Supporting classroom discussion: The role of accountability to rigorous thinking. Theory Into Practice, 59(1), 15–24. doi:https://doi.org/10.1080/00405841.2019.1665443
Pamungkas, I. N. (2021). Komunikasi dosen dengan mahasiswa kelompok digital-natives di perguruan tinggi. Avant Garde, 09(01), 79–99. doi:https://journal.budiluhur.ac.id/avantgarde/article/download/1229/pdf_54?utm_source=chatgpt.com
Rogers, C. R. (1983). Freedom to learn for the 80s. Columbus, OH: Charles E. Merrill.
Shen, L. (2025). Psychological safety and trust as drivers of teachers’ adaptive behavior. doi:Scientific Reports. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-025-13789-4
Siregar, R. Y. (2022). Strategi komunikasi dosen digital immigrant dalam proses mengajar daring pada bidang sains dan teknologi. Ettisal: Journal of Communication. https://ejournal.unida.gontor.ac.id/index.php/ettisal/article/view/6872?utm_source=chatgpt.com, 6(2). Diambil kembali dari https://ejournal.unida.gontor.ac.id/index.php/ettisal/article/view/6872?utm_source=ch
Thomas, E., & Gupta, P. (2024). Relational trust and student agency: Exploring the impact of instructor openness in law school pedagogy. Journal of Legal Education, 73(2), 221–244.
Tu, X. (2021). The Role of Classroom Culture and Psychological Safety in EFL Students’ Engagement. Frontiers in Psychology, 760903, 12. doi:10.3389/fpsyg.2021.760903
Xie, R., Jiang, J., Yue, L., Ye, L., An, D., & Liu., Y. (2022). The beneficial effects of teacher–student conflict. International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health, 19(5), 9300. doi:https://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph19159300
Yusuf, B. (2025). Teknologi dan personalisasi pembelajaran pendidikan Islam untuk generasi Z. Journal of Instructional and Development Researches, 4(4). Diambil kembali dari https://www.journal.iel-education.org/index.php/JIDeR/article/view/344?utm_source
Downloads
Published
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2025 Aminudin, S.H.,M.H, Risman Munanto, S.Fil.,M.Fil, Ikbal, S.Pd.,M.Pd (Author)

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.








